• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Extras / Glossary / Forcings Forçages

Forcings Forçages

28 Nov 2004 by group

Forcings in the climate sense are external boundary conditions or inputs to a climate model. Obviously changes to the sun’s radiation are external, and so that is always a forcing. The same is true for changes to the Earth’s orbit (“Milankovitch cycles”). Things get a little more ambigous as you get closer to the surface. In models that do not contain a carbon cycle (and that is most of them), the level of CO2 is set externally, and so that can be considered a forcing too. However, in models that contain a carbon cycle, changes in CO2 concentrations will occur as a function of the climate itself and in changes in emissions from industrial activity. In that case, CO2 levels will be a feedback, and not a forcing. Almost all of the elements that make up the atmosphere can be considered feedbacks on some timescale, and so defining the forcing is really a function of what feedbacks you allow in the model and for what purpose you are using it. A good discussion of recent forcings can be found in Hansen et al (2002) and in Schmidt et al (2004).

Les forçages aux sens climatique du terme, correspondent aux conditions aux limites ou “entrées” (input du modèle climatique. Les changements de rayonnement solaire sont évidemment externes, de telle manière qu’ils forment toujours un forçage. C’est également vrai pour les changements de l’orbite terrestre (“Cycles de Milankovitch”). Par contre, cette définition est plus ambiguë quand on se rapproche de la surface de la planète. Dans les modèles n’incluant pas le cycle du carbone (c’est a dire la majorité), la concentration du CO2 est fixée en externe, ce qui peut donc être considéré comme un forçage également. Par contre, dans les modèles qui incluent le cycle du carbone, les changements de concentration en CO2 seront fonction du climat et des changements liés a l’activité industrielle. Dans ce cas, les niveaux de CO2 seront des rétroactions, et non pas des forçages. Presque tous les éléments constitutifs de l’atmosphère peuvent être considérées comme des rétroactions, et donc définir un forçage est réellement dépendant des rétroactions possibles dans le modèle, et dans quel but il est utilisé. Une bonne discussion des forçages récents peut être trouvée dans Hansen et al (2002) et dans Schmidt et al (2004).

Filed Under: Glossary

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Nigelj on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Karsten V. Johansen on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • patrick o twentyseven on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Karsten V. Johansen on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • zebra on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • jgnfld on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • MA Rodger on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Tomáš Kalisz on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • John Pollack on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Edward Burke on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • MA Rodger on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Martin Smith on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Radge Havers on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Dave_Geologist on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Dave_Geologist on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Pete Best on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Mr. Know It All on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Piotr on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Piotr on The Puzzling Pleistocene
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Piotr on The Puzzling Pleistocene

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,401 posts

15 pages

250,998 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.