• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Extras / Glossary / Forcings Forçages

Forcings Forçages

28 Nov 2004 by group

Forcings in the climate sense are external boundary conditions or inputs to a climate model. Obviously changes to the sun’s radiation are external, and so that is always a forcing. The same is true for changes to the Earth’s orbit (“Milankovitch cycles”). Things get a little more ambigous as you get closer to the surface. In models that do not contain a carbon cycle (and that is most of them), the level of CO2 is set externally, and so that can be considered a forcing too. However, in models that contain a carbon cycle, changes in CO2 concentrations will occur as a function of the climate itself and in changes in emissions from industrial activity. In that case, CO2 levels will be a feedback, and not a forcing. Almost all of the elements that make up the atmosphere can be considered feedbacks on some timescale, and so defining the forcing is really a function of what feedbacks you allow in the model and for what purpose you are using it. A good discussion of recent forcings can be found in Hansen et al (2002) and in Schmidt et al (2004).

Les forçages aux sens climatique du terme, correspondent aux conditions aux limites ou “entrées” (input du modèle climatique. Les changements de rayonnement solaire sont évidemment externes, de telle manière qu’ils forment toujours un forçage. C’est également vrai pour les changements de l’orbite terrestre (“Cycles de Milankovitch”). Par contre, cette définition est plus ambiguë quand on se rapproche de la surface de la planète. Dans les modèles n’incluant pas le cycle du carbone (c’est a dire la majorité), la concentration du CO2 est fixée en externe, ce qui peut donc être considéré comme un forçage également. Par contre, dans les modèles qui incluent le cycle du carbone, les changements de concentration en CO2 seront fonction du climat et des changements liés a l’activité industrielle. Dans ce cas, les niveaux de CO2 seront des rétroactions, et non pas des forçages. Presque tous les éléments constitutifs de l’atmosphère peuvent être considérées comme des rétroactions, et donc définir un forçage est réellement dépendant des rétroactions possibles dans le modèle, et dans quel but il est utilisé. Une bonne discussion des forçages récents peut être trouvée dans Hansen et al (2002) et dans Schmidt et al (2004).

Filed Under: Glossary

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • 2025 Updates
  • A peek behind the curtain…
  • AI/ML climate magic?

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Tomáš Kalisz on 2025 Updates
  • Susan Anderson on 2025 Updates
  • Radge Havers on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Radge Havers on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Martin Smith on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Ron R. on 2025 Updates
  • Ray Ladbury on Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Barton Paul Levenson on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Eli Rabett on Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Martin Smith on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Martin Smith on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Keith Woollard on Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Pete best on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Martin Smith on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Martin Smith on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Martin Smith on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • Ron R. on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Nigelj on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Ron R. on 2025 Updates
  • Ron R. on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Radge Havers on The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Joseph O’Sullivan on A peek behind the curtain…
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Feb 2026
  • jgnfld on 2025 Updates
  • Tomáš Kalisz on 2025 Updates

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,397 posts

15 pages

250,102 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.