• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics

Blog – realclimate.org – All Posts

Aerosol formation and climate, Part I

13 Apr 2009 by group

Guest post by Bart Verheggen, Department of Air Quality and Climate Change , Energy research Institute of the Netherlands (ECN)

The impacts of aerosols on climate are significant, but also very uncertain. There are several reasons for this, one of which is the uncertainty in how and how fast they are formed in the atmosphere by nucleation. Here, in part I, I’ll review some of the basic processes that are important in determining the climate effects of aerosols, focusing in particular on their formation. This is also relevant in order to better understand –and hopefully quantify- the hypothetical climate effects of galactic cosmic rays which I’ll discuss in a follow-up post.

Una traduzione in italiano è disponibile qui
[Read more…] about Aerosol formation and climate, Part I

Filed Under: Aerosols, Climate Science

Breaking the silence about Spring

11 Apr 2009 by eric

Did you know that in 1965 the U.S. Department of Agriculture planted a particular variety of lilac in more than seventy locations around the U.S. Northeast, to detect the onset of spring — in turn to be used to determine the appropriate timing of corn planting and the like? The records the USDA have kept show that those same lilacs are blooming as much as two weeks earlier than they did in 1965. April has, in a very real sense, become May. This is one of the interesting facts that you’ll read about in Amy Seidl’s book, Early Spring, a hot-off-the-press essay about the impacts of climate change on the world immediately around us – the forest, the birds, the butterflies in our backyards.
[Read more…] about Breaking the silence about Spring

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Reviews

Wilkins ice shelf collapse

6 Apr 2009 by Gavin

Since people are wanting to talk about the latest events on the Antarctic Peninsula, this is a post for that discussion.

The imagery from ESA (animation here) tells the recent story quite clearly – the last sliver of ice between the main Wilkins ice shelf and Charcot Island is currently collapsing in a very interesting way (from a materials science point of view). For some of the history of the collapse, see our previous post. This is the tenth major ice shelf to collapse in recent times.

Maybe we can get some updates and discussion of potential implications from the people working on this in the comments….?

Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Climate Science

Advocacy vs. Science

1 Apr 2009 by Gavin

The advocate will pick up any piece of apparently useful data and without doing any analysis, decide that their pet theory perfectly explains any anomaly without consideration of any alternative explanations. Their conclusion is always that their original theory is correct.

The scientist will look at all possibilities and revise their thinking based on a thorough assessment of all issues – data quality, model quality and appropriateness of the the comparison. Their conclusion follows from the analysis whatever it points to.

Which one is which?

Filed Under: Climate Science

Farewell to our Readers

1 Apr 2009 by group

We would like to apologize to our loyal readers who have provided us so much support since we first went online in December 2004. However, after listening to the compelling arguments of the distinguished speakers who participated in the Heartland Institute’s recent global warming contrarian conference, we have decided that the science is settled — in favor of the contrarians. Indeed, even IPCC chair Rajendra Pachauri has now admitted that anthropogenic climate change was a massive hoax after all. Accordingly, RealClimate no longer has a reason for existence. The contrarians have made a convincing case that (a) global warming isn’t happening, (b) even if it is, its entirely natural and within the bounds of natural variability, (c) well, even if its not natural, it is modest in nature and not a threat, (d) even if anthropogenic warming should turn out to be pronounced as projected, it will sure be good for us, leading to abundant crops and a healthy environment, and (e) well, it might actually be really bad, but hey, its unstoppable anyway. (Can we get our check now?)

Filed Under: Climate Science

A potentially useful book – Lies, Damn lies & Science

29 Mar 2009 by rasmus

Lies, Damned Lies, and ScienceAccording to a recent article in Eos (Doran and Zimmermann, ‘Examining the Scientific consensus on Climate Change‘, Volume 90, Number 3, 2009; p. 22-23 – only available for AGU members – update: a public link to the article is here), about 58% of the general public in the US thinks that human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing the mean global temperature, as opposed to 97% of specialists surveyed. The disproportion between these numbers is a concern, and one possible explanation may be that the science literacy among the general public is low. Perhaps Sherry Seethaler’s new book ‘Lies, Damn Lies, and Science’ can be a useful contribution in raising the science literacy?

[Read more…] about A potentially useful book – Lies, Damn lies & Science

Filed Under: Communicating Climate

Michaels’ new graph

26 Mar 2009 by Gavin

Every so often people who are determined to prove a particular point will come up with a new way to demonstrate it. This new methodology can initially seem compelling, but if the conclusion is at odds with other more standard ways of looking at the same question, further investigation can often reveal some hidden dependencies or non-robustness. And so it is with the new graph being cited purporting to show that the models are an “abject” failure.

[Read more…] about Michaels’ new graph

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Instrumental Record

With all due respect…

24 Mar 2009 by group

There was a great comedy piece a few years back (whose origin escapes us) that gave examples of how the English would use their language when speaking to a non-native speaker to imply the precise opposite of what was actually being understood. This allowed the English to feel superior without actually damaging international relations. One example was the phrase “with all due respect” which is generally understood to imply that the speaker has a great deal of respect for their counterpart, while the speaker is actually implying that they have no respect in the slightest for their interlocutor. The respect due being precisely zero.

This thought occurred to us when a few of us opened our email this week to see a draft ad being sent around by the Cato Institute (i.e. Pat Michaels) looking for signatories prior to being published in “major US newspapers” sometime soon:

Una traduzione in italiano è disponibile qui
[Read more…] about With all due respect…

Filed Under: Climate Science, skeptics

Olympian efforts to control pollution

14 Mar 2009 by Gavin

There is a new paper in Science this week on changes to atmospheric visibility. In clear sky conditions (no clouds), this is related mainly to the amount of aerosols (particulate matter) in the air (but is slightly dependent on the amount of water vapour as well, which is corrected for in this study). The authors report that the clear-sky visibility has decreased almost everywhere (particularly in Asia) from 1973 to 2007, with the exception of Europe where visibility has increased (consistent with the ‘brightening trend’ reported recently). Trends in North American stations seem relatively flat.

There is another story that didn’t get as much press when it came out late last year but that is highly relevant to this issue – whether any of the efforts that the Chinese authorities to reduce air pollution ahead of the Olympics last year had any impact. To the extent that they did, they might point the way to reducing aerosols and other pollutants across Asia, but it might also reveal how hard it is to do so.
[Read more…] about Olympian efforts to control pollution

Filed Under: Aerosols, Climate Science

Advice for a young climate blogger

9 Mar 2009 by group

Congratulations! You have taken the first step towards attempting to communicate your expertise and thoughts to the wider world, which remains poorly served by its traditional sources of information when it comes to complex societally relevant issues like climate change. Your aim to clarify the science (or policy options or ethical considerations or simply to explain your views) is a noble endeavor and we wish you luck and wide readership. But do be aware that you are dipping your blog into sometimes treacherous waters. Bad things can happen to good bloggers. So in a spirit of blog-camaraderie, and in light of our own experiences and observations, we offer some advice that may be of some help in navigating the political climate relatively unscathed.
Una traduzione in italiano è disponibile qui
Una traducción está disponible aquí.

[Read more…] about Advice for a young climate blogger

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 89
  • Page 90
  • Page 91
  • Page 92
  • Page 93
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 140
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • 1.5ºC and all that
  • Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Who should pay?
  • Site updates etc.
  • Raising Climate Literacy

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Yebo Kando on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Data on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Piotr on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Keith Woollard on 1.5ºC and all that
  • John Pollack on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Data on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Data on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Data on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Data on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Data on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Data on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Data on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Data on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Data on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Nigelj on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Nigelj on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Jan 2026
  • Denis Rancourt on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Mal Adapted on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Martin Smith on 1.5ºC and all that
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
  • Kevin McKinney on 1.5ºC and all that
  • Data on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,391 posts

15 pages

249,141 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.