• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Archives for Communicating Climate

Communicating Climate

The legend of the Titanic

3 May 2012 by rasmus

It’s 100 years since the Titanic sank in the North Atlantic, and it’s still remembered today. It was one of those landmark events that make a deep impression on people. It also fits a pattern of how we respond to different conditions, according to a recent book about the impact of environmental science on the society (Gudmund Hernes Hot Topic – Cold Comfort): major events are the stimulus and the change of mind is the response.

Hernes suggests that one of those turning moments that made us realize our true position in the universe was when we for the first time saw our own planet from space.

[Read more…] about The legend of the Titanic

Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate

The IPCC SREX: the report is finally out.

29 Mar 2012 by rasmus

Some of us have been waiting quite a while now, especially since the ‘road tour’ meant to present the Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation starting in Oslo on January 24th this year. The summary for policymakers (SPM) was released already in 18 November 2011 (Kampala) and now the report is finally available (link).

[Read more…] about The IPCC SREX: the report is finally out.

Filed Under: Climate Science, RC Forum, Reporting on climate, Reviews, statistics

Data presentation: A trend lesson

23 Mar 2012 by rasmus

I just came across an interesting way to eliminate the impression of a global warming. A trick used to argue that the global warming had stopped, and the simple recipe is as follows:

  • Cut off parts of the measurements and only keep the last 17 years.
  • Plot all the months of these 17 years to get plenty of data points.
  • A good idea is to show a streched plot with longer time axis.
  • [Read more…] about Data presentation: A trend lesson

    Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Instrumental Record, Scientific practice, skeptics

    Free speech and academic freedom

    12 Feb 2012 by rasmus

    Update: Some related concerns from deepclimate.org, if these claims can be verified.

    In a recent interview for a Norwegian magazine (Teknisk Ukeblad, 0412), the IPCC chair Rajendra Kumar Pachauri told the journalist that he had received death threats in connection with his role as a head for the IPCC. There have also been recent reports of threats and harassment of climate scientists for their stance on climate change (Kerry Emanuel. Katharine Hayhoe, Australian climate scientists, Phil Jones, Barton campaign, and Inhofe’s black list).

    [Read more…] about Free speech and academic freedom

    Filed Under: Communicating Climate, RC Forum, skeptics

    The dog is the weather

    17 Jan 2012 by rasmus

    Update January 27: There is also another recent dog-based animations from Victoria (southeast Australia) explaining some of the key drivers of our climate and how some are changing.

    A TV series that ran on Norwegian TV (NRK) last year included a simple and fun cartoon that demonstrates some important concepts relative to weather and climate:

    In the animation, the man’s path can be considered as analogous to a directional climatic change, while the path traced by his dog’s whimsical movements represent weather fluctuations, as constrained by the man’s path, the leash, and the dog’s moment-by-moment decisions of what seems important to investigate in his small world. What might the leash length represent? The man’s momentary pause? The dog’s exact route relative to concepts of random variation? The messages in this animation are similar to the recent results of Grant Foster and Stefan Rahmstorf in ERL (see post here).

    We’d also like to praise the TV-series ‘Siffer‘, hosted by an enthusiastic statistician explaining how most things in our world relate to mathematics. The series covers a range of subjects, for instance gambling theory, the Tragedy of the Commons, anecdotes about mathematical riddles, medical statistics, and construction design; it even answers why champagne from a large bottle tastes better than that from a smaller one. There is also an episode devoted to weather forecasting and climate.

    Success in understanding our universe often depends on how the ‘story’ about it is told, and a big part of that often involves how mental images are presented. Mathematics and statistics can describe nature in great detail and “elegance”, but they are often difficult and inaccessible to the average person. Conversely, the man-and-dog animation is intuitive and easy to comprehend. Similarly, Hans Rosling’s Fun with Stats provides some very nice demonstrations of how to convey meaning via the creative display of numbers.

    Filed Under: Climate impacts, Communicating Climate, El Nino, Greenhouse gases, Tutorials

    Copernicus and Arrhenius: Physics Then and Physics Today

    21 Dec 2011 by eric

    There was a really interesting article in Physics Today this past October on the parallels between the slow acceptance of the idea of anthropogenic climate change and of the idea that the earth circles the sun.
    [Read more…] about Copernicus and Arrhenius: Physics Then and Physics Today

    Filed Under: Climate Science, Greenhouse gases, Scientific practice, skeptics

    Curve-fitting and natural cycles: The best part

    15 Dec 2011 by rasmus


    It is not every day that I come across a scientific publication that so totally goes against my perception of what science is all about. Humlum et al., 2011 present a study in the journal Global and Planetary Change, claiming that most of the temperature changes that we have seen so far are due to natural cycles.

    They claim to present a new technique to identify the character of natural climate variations, and from this, to produce a testable forecast of future climate. They project that

    the observed late 20th century warming in Svalbard is not going to continue for the next 20–25 years. Instead the period of warming may be followed by variable, but generally not higher temperatures for at least the next 20–25 years.

    However, their claims of novelty are overblown, and their projection is demonstrably unsound.

    [Read more…] about Curve-fitting and natural cycles: The best part

    References

    1. O. Humlum, J. Solheim, and K. Stordahl, "Identifying natural contributions to late Holocene climate change", Global and Planetary Change, vol. 79, pp. 145-156, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.09.005

    Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Climate Science, Instrumental Record, Scientific practice, skeptics, Sun-earth connections, Tutorials

    AGU 2011: Day 1

    6 Dec 2011 by group

    A number of us are at the big AGU meeting in San Francisco this week (among 20,000 other geophysicists). We will try to provide a daily summary of interesting talks and posters we come across, but obviously this won’t be complete or comprehensive.

    Other bloggers are covering the event (twitter #AGU11). A small number of the posters are viewable on their website as well.

    Monday

    Two good general talks this morning – Harry Elderfield gave the Emiliani lecture and started off with a fascinating discussion of the early discussions of Harold Urey and Cesare Emiliani on isotope thermometry – and showed that even Nobel Prize winners (Urey – for the discovery of deuterium) are sometimes quite wrong – in this case for insisting that the overall isotope ratio in the ocean could not ever change. (This talk should become available online here).

    The second general talk was by author Simon Winchester who excellently demonstrated how to communicate about geology by using human stories. He gave a number of vignettes from his latest book about the Atlantic ocean – including stories of the shipwreck of the Dunedin Star on the ‘Skeleton coast’ of Southern Africa, time on St Helena, and the fate of his book on the Pacific that apparently only sold 12 copies… He finished with a mea culpa and gracious apology to the assorted geophysicists for his rather hurried comments on the Tohoku earthquake disaster that caused some consternation earlier this year. In his defense, he only had 90 minutes to write what he was unaware would be the Newsweek cover story that week.

    In the science sessions in the afternoon, there was some good talks related to attributing extreme events including Marty Hoerling discussing the Moscow heat wave and a very different perspective from the cpdn group in Oxford. It would have been good to have had some actual discussion between the different people, but AGU is not conducive to much back and forth because of the very tight scheduling. The oxford group estimated (based on volunteer computing) that the likelihood of the Russian heat wave was something like 3 times more likely with 2000’s background climate vs the 1980’s. Some good points were made about the non-Gaussian nature of observed distributions the semantic challenges in explain attribution when there are both proximate and ultimate causes. Kerry Emanuel gave an update of his views on hurricane climate connections.

    In the next door session, there was interesting discussion on the philosophy of climate modelling (from actual philosophers!) and the strategies that need to be adopted in dealing with the multi-model ensembles of CMIP3 and CMIP5.

    (Day 2)(Days 3&4)(Day 5 and wrap up)

    Filed Under: Climate Science, Reporting on climate, Scientific practice

    Two-year old turkey

    22 Nov 2011 by Gavin

    The blogosphere is abuzz with the appearance of a second tranche of the emails stolen from CRU just before thanksgiving in 2009. Our original commentary is still available of course (CRU Hack, CRU Hack: Context, etc.), and very little appears to be new in this batch. Indeed, even the out-of-context quotes aren’t that exciting, and are even less so in-context.

    A couple of differences in this go around are worth noting: the hacker was much more careful to cover their tracks in the zip file they produced – all the file dates are artificially set to Jan 1 2011 for instance, and they didn’t bother to hack into the RealClimate server this time either. Hopefully they have left some trails that the police can trace a little more successfully than they’ve been able to thus far from the previous release.

    But the timing of this release is strange. Presumably it is related to the upcoming Durban talks, but it really doesn’t look like there is anything worth derailing there at all. Indeed, this might even increase interest! A second release would have been far more effective a few weeks after the first – before the inquiries and while people still had genuine questions. Now, it just seems a little forced, and perhaps a symptom of the hacker’s frustration that nothing much has come of it all and that the media and conversation has moved on.

    If anyone has any questions about anything they see that seems interesting, let us know in the comments and we’ll see if we can provide some context. We anticipate normal service will be resumed shortly.

    Filed Under: Climate Science, Reporting on climate, Scientific practice, skeptics

    The IPCC report on extreme climate and weather events

    19 Nov 2011 by rasmus

    The IPCC recently released the policy-maker’s summary (SREX-SPM) on extreme weather and climate events. The background for this report is a larger report that is due to be published in the near future, and one gets a taste of this in the ‘wordle‘ figure below. By the way, the phrase ‘ET’ in this context does not refer ‘extra-terrestrial’, and ‘AL’ is not a person, but these refer to the way of citing many scholars: ‘et al.‘

    Fig. 1. The text analysis according to http://www.wordle.net/

    [Read more…] about The IPCC report on extreme climate and weather events

    Filed Under: Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Hurricanes, IPCC, Reporting on climate

    • « Go to Previous Page
    • Page 1
    • Interim pages omitted …
    • Page 12
    • Page 13
    • Page 14
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • Interim pages omitted …
    • Page 29
    • Go to Next Page »

    Primary Sidebar

    Search

    Search for:

    Email Notification

    get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
    Loading

    Recent Posts

    • Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
    • Who should pay?
    • Site updates etc.
    • Raising Climate Literacy
    • Unforced variations: Nov 2025
    • High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)

    Our Books

    Book covers
    This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
    All Books >>

    Recent Comments

    • Nigelj on Who should pay?
    • Nigelj on Raising Climate Literacy
    • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
    • Ken Towe on Who should pay?
    • Ken Towe on Who should pay?
    • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Raising Climate Literacy
    • JCM on Raising Climate Literacy
    • Ken Towe on Who should pay?
    • Ken Towe on Who should pay?
    • Ron R. on Who should pay?
    • Atomsk's Sanakan on Raising Climate Literacy
    • Neurodivergent on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
    • Neurodivergent on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
    • Ray Ladbury on Who should pay?
    • Yebo Kandu on Raising Climate Literacy
    • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
    • Kevin McKinney on Who should pay?
    • Kevin McKinney on Who should pay?
    • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
    • Barry E Finch on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
    • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
    • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
    • Barton Paul Levenson on Who should pay?
    • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
    • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Dec 2025
    • Mr. Know It All on Who should pay?
    • patrick o twentyseven on Who should pay?
    • Eddy on Raising Climate Literacy
    • patrick o twentyseven on Who should pay?
    • patrick o twentyseven on Who should pay?

    Footer

    ABOUT

    • About
    • Translations
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Page
    • Login

    DATA AND GRAPHICS

    • Data Sources
    • Model-Observation Comparisons
    • Surface temperature graphics
    • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

    INDEX

    • Acronym index
    • Index
    • Archives
    • Contributors

    Realclimate Stats

    1,389 posts

    15 pages

    248,746 comments

    Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.