• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Archives for Climate Science / Model-Obs Comparisons

Model-Obs Comparisons

How robust is our accelerometer?

8 Mar 2026 by group 41 Comments

Guest commentary from Nathan Lenssen (Colorado School of Mines)

A new analysis of historical temperatures suggests that things are getting warmer faster, but what does it mean for the future?

[Read more…] about How robust is our accelerometer?

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, El Nino, Featured Story, Greenhouse gases, Instrumental Record, Model-Obs Comparisons, statistics Tagged With: acceleration, CMIP6

Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies

7 Feb 2026 by Gavin 44 Comments

At a public event debating the DOE CWG report, Steve Koonin embarrasses himself further.

[Read more…] about Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Featured Story, Instrumental Record, Model-Obs Comparisons, skeptics Tagged With: CMIP6, CWG, DOE, Scafetta, Steve Koonin

2025 Updates

27 Jan 2026 by group 189 Comments

Our various graphics and model-observation comparisons have been updated with 2025 data. There are a few version updates that make some difference (particularly in sea ice extent), but the basic story is similar to last year. Feel free to comment and/or suggest changes for the future, including potential new comparisons.

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Featured Story, Instrumental Record, Model-Obs Comparisons Tagged With: CMIP3, CMIP5, CMIP6, MSU, SSU

DOE CWG Report “Moot”?

10 Sep 2025 by Gavin

Somewhat breaking news. A court filing (from 9/4) from DOE has noted that the Climate Working Group has been disbanded (as of 9/3). This was done to make the EDF/UCS lawsuit moot, but it also means that DOE is withdrawing the report, no-one will respond appropriately to the comments submitted, and (possibly) it becomes irrelevant for the EPA reconsideration of the Endangerment Finding.

What a farce.

Update: Via Andy Revkin, the EDF/UCS’s blistering response to the DOE filing. Pass the popcorn.

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Featured Story, Instrumental Record, IPCC, Model-Obs Comparisons, Scientific practice

Climate Scientists response to DOE report

2 Sep 2025 by Gavin

As we’ve mentioned, Andrew Dessler and Robert Kopp have been coordinating a scientific peer review of the DOW ‘CWG’ Critique of Climate Science. It is now out.

[Read more…] about Climate Scientists response to DOE report

Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Carbon cycle, Climate impacts, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Featured Story, Greenhouse gases, Hurricanes, Instrumental Record, IPCC, Model-Obs Comparisons, Scientific practice, Sea level rise, Sun-earth connections Tagged With: CWG, DOE, Endangerment Finding

Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’

14 Aug 2025 by group

The first somewhat comprehensive reviews of the DOE critical review are now coming online.

[Read more…] about Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Communicating Climate, Featured Story, Greenhouse gases, In the News, Instrumental Record, Model-Obs Comparisons, Reporting on climate, skeptics Tagged With: climate change, DOE, Endangerment Finding, EPA

The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?

29 Jul 2025 by group

The EPA, along with the “Climate Working Group” (CWG) of usual suspects (plus Judith Curry and Ross McKitrick) at DOE, have just put out a document for public comment their attempt to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding for greenhouse gas emissions.

[Read more…] about The Endangerment of the Endangerment Finding?

Filed Under: Climate impacts, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Featured Story, Greenhouse gases, In the News, Instrumental Record, IPCC, Model-Obs Comparisons, Reporting on climate Tagged With: DOE, Endangerment Finding, EPA

Melange à Trois

8 Jul 2025 by Gavin

In honor of the revelation today, that Koonin, Christy and Spencer have been made Special Government Employees at the Dept. of Energy, we present a quick round up of our commentary on the caliber of their arguments we’ve posted here over the last decade or so.

TL;DR? The arguments are not very good.

[Read more…] about Melange à Trois

Filed Under: Climate Science, Featured Story, In the News, Instrumental Record, Model-Obs Comparisons, Scientific practice Tagged With: John Christy, MSU, Roy Spencer, Steve Koonin

Predicted Arctic sea ice trends over time

31 May 2025 by Gavin

Over multiple generations of CMIP models Arctic sea ice trend predictions have gone from much too stable to about right. Why?

[Read more…] about Predicted Arctic sea ice trends over time

Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Featured Story, Model-Obs Comparisons Tagged With: Arctic amplification, CMIP3, CMIP5, CMIP6

Comparison Update 2024

27 Jan 2025 by Gavin

One more dot on the graphs for our annual model-observations comparisons updates. Given how extraordinary the last two years have been, there are a few highlights to note.

[Read more…] about Comparison Update 2024

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Featured Story, Instrumental Record, Model-Obs Comparisons

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Unforced variations: Feb 2026

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Pete Best on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Wolfgang on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Martin Smith on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Martin Smith on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Dominik Lenné on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • zebra on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Ken Towe on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • JCM on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Pete Best on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Keith Woollard on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • John Pollack on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Secular Animist on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Ray Ladbury on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ray Ladbury on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Ray Ladbury on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Radge Havers on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,400 posts

15 pages

250,701 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.