• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Archives for group

group

Comment policy

9 Dec 2004 by group

  1. Comments are moderated. Comments are periodically reviewed, but especially at weekends, evenings and holidays, there may be some delay in approving otherwise non-contentious posts. Please be patient.
  2. Questions, clarifications and serious rebuttals and discussions are welcomed.
  3. Only comments that are germane to the post will be approved. Comments that are “off-topic” should be made on an open thread (usually entitled “Unforced Variations”), and we may move OT comments to those threads.
  4. Comments that contain links to inappropriate, irrelevant or commercial sites may be deleted.
  5. Discussion of non-scientific subjects is discouraged.
  6. No flames, profanity, ad hominem comments are allowed. This includes comments that (explicitly or implicitly) impugn the motives of others, or which otherwise try to personalize matters under discussion.
  7. We reserve the right to make spelling corrections, correct text format problems, etc.
  8. We use moderation to improve the “signal to noise” in the discussion. For this reason, we may choose to screen out comments that simply repeat points made in previous comments, make claims that have already been dealt with or that “muddy the water” by introducing erroneous, specious, or otherwise misleading assertions. These comments may be sent to “The Bore Hole“.
  9. We reserve the right to either reject comments that do not meet the above criteria, or in certain cases to edit them in a manner that brings them into accordance with our comments policy (e.g. by simply deleting inflammatory or ad hominem language from an otherwise worthy comment). In cases where we do this, it will be noted by an [edit].
  10. Given that RealClimate represents a volunteer effort by about 10 different contributors, each of whom are free to participate in queue moderation, the items indicated above only constitute the basic ground rules. We cannot insure uniform application of the various considerations listed above from one individual comment to the next.
  11. Quick responses to questions that don’t merit a full post will be placed in-line (with credits).
  12. All comments are assumed to be released into the public domain.
  13. Comments generally close after a month.
  14. Repeat violators of our comments policy (in particular, individuals demonstrating a pattern of “trolling”) may be barred from future access to the blog.

revised 01/06/11

Filed Under: Comment Policy

The Surface Temperature Record and the Urban Heat Island

6 Dec 2004 by group

There are quite a few reasons to believe that the surface temperature record – which shows a warming of approximately 0.6°-0.8°C over the last century (depending on precisely how the warming trend is defined) – is essentially uncontaminated by the effects of urban growth and the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect. These include that the land, borehole and marine records substantially agree; and the fact that there is little difference between the long-term (1880 to 1998) rural (0.70°C/century) and full set of station temperature trends (actually less at 0.65°C/century). This and other information lead the IPCC to conclude that the UHI effect makes at most a contribution of 0.05°C to the warming observed over the past century.

[Read more…] about The Surface Temperature Record and the Urban Heat Island

Filed Under: Instrumental Record

The Bore Hole

6 Dec 2004 by group

A place for comments that would otherwise disrupt sensible conversations.

Filed Under: The Bore Hole

Contributors

6 Dec 2004 by group

The current contributors to content on this site are:

  • Gavin Schmidt
  • Michael Mann
  • Rasmus Benestad
  • Stefan Rahmstorf
  • Eric Steig

William Connolley was a contributor, but has now left academia; Ray Bradley, David Archer, and Ray Pierrehumbert are no longer active; Jim Bouldin was a contributor from 2009 and Caspar Ammann and Thibault de Garidel were early supporters of the site. Group posts can be assumed to be the from the whole set of current contributers, or will be individually signed.

Filed Under: Contributor Bio's

Caspar Ammann

6 Dec 2004 by group

Caspar Ammann is a climate scientist working at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). Dr. Ammann is interested in the reconstruction of natural climate forcings, natural climate variability, coupled modeling of natural and anthropogenic climate change, and data/model intercomparison. Dr. Ammann got his B.S. from Gymnasium Koeniz (Switzerland), his M.S. from the University of Bern (Switzerland), and a Ph.D. from the Department of Geosciences at the University of Massachusetts.

Filed Under: Contributor Bio's

William M. Connolley

6 Dec 2004 by group

When I joined RC, I was a climate modeller with the British Antarctic Survey. Now I’m a software engineer for CSR. I’m still interested in communicating the science of climate change, but can no longer do so at a professional level.

I’m also elsewhere: the wikipedia project is developing into a useful resource, and my profile is User:William_M._Connolley. My personal vanity site is at www.wmconnolley.org.uk.

One of the people in the picture is me. Guess which.

ps: all my contributions online are released under the GFDL, unless I explicitly note otherwise.

Filed Under: Contributor Bio's

Thibault de Garidel

6 Dec 2004 by group

Dr. de Garidel received his Bachelor’s degree in Earth Sciences from the Université Lyon I, France, completed a Master in the Université Bordeaux I, France and a Ph.D. in Geosciences at CEREGE, Université Paul Cézanne (a.k.a. Aix-Marseille III).

More information about his research and publication record can be found here.

Filed Under: Contributor Bio's

What does the lag of CO2 behind temperature in ice cores tell us about global warming?

3 Dec 2004 by group

Translations: (Français)

This is an issue that is often misunderstood in the public sphere and media, so it is worth spending some time to explain it and clarify it. At least three careful ice core studies have shown that CO2 starts to rise about 800 years (600-1000 years) after Antarctic temperature during glacial terminations. These terminations are pronounced warming periods that mark the ends of the ice ages that happen every 100,000 years or so.

Does this prove that CO2 doesn’t cause global warming? The answer is no.

[Read more…] about What does the lag of CO2 behind temperature in ice cores tell us about global warming?

Filed Under: FAQ, Greenhouse gases, Paleoclimate

1 Dec 2004 by group

https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/search-results/

Filed Under: Extras

Index

1 Dec 2004 by group

In addition to the category indexing on the side bar, we have set out a more thematic index here to help you find your way through the content on the site. [Note: this was kept up-to-date through about 2008. For more recent articles, please use the search function.]

Themes: Aerosols, Arctic and Antarctic climate, Atmospheric Science, Climate modelling, Climate sensitivity, Extreme events, Global warming, Greenhouse gases, Mitigation of Climate Change, Present-day observations, Oceans, Paleo-climate, Responses to common contrarian arguments, The Practice of Science, Solar forcing, Projections of future climate, Climate in the media, Meeting Reports, Miscellaneous.

If you are looking for introductions to the whole topic, start here.

Aerosols:

  • “Global Dimming?“
  • “Global Dimming II“
  • “Pollution-Climate Connections“
  • “Global Dimming may have a brighter future“
  • “Climate sensitivity and aerosol forcings“
  • “An Aerosol Tour de Forcing“
  • “Global Dimming and climate models“
  • “Current volcanic activity and climate?“
  • “Aerosols: The Last Frontier?“
  • “Ozone impacts on climate change“
  • “Perspectives from China“
  • “Global dimming and global warming“
  • “Aerosols, Chemistry and Climate“

Arctic and Antarctic climate:

  • “The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment“
  • “The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment II“
  • “The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment III“
  • “Will spring 2005 be a bad one for Arctic ozone?“
  • “2005 Record Arctic Ozone Loss“
  • “Retreating Glacier Fronts on the Antarctic Peninsula over the Past Half-Century“
  • “650,000 years of greenhouse gas concentrations“
  • “Polar Amplification“
  • “The Greenland Ice“
  • “How much future sea level rise? More evidence from models and ice sheet observations.“
  • “Significant Warming of the Antarctic Winter Troposphere“
  • “More on the Arctic“
  • “Sea level in the Arctic“
  • “Ice Sheets and Sea Level Rise: Model Failure is the Key Issue“
  • “The Copenhagen Consensus“
  • “Is Antarctic climate changing?“
  • “Historical climatology in Greenland“
  • “Not just ice albedo“
  • “Arctic Sea Ice decline in the 21st Century“
  • “Making sense of Greenland’s ice“
  • “Arctic sea ice watch“
  • “New rule for high profile papers“
  • “Antarctica is Cold? Yeah, We Knew That“
  • “Moulins, Calving Fronts and Greenland Outlet Glacier Acceleration“
  • “North Pole notes“
  • “Ice Shelf Instability“
  • “North Pole notes (continued)“
  • “How much will sea level rise?“
  • “On straw men and Greenland: Tad Pfeffer Responds“
  • “What links the retreat of Jakobshavn Isbrae, Wilkins Ice Shelf and the Petermann Glacier?“

Atmospheric Science:

  • “Water vapour: feedback or forcing?“
  • “Et Tu LT?“
  • “The tropical lapse rate quandary“
  • “Busy Week for Water Vapor“
  • “More satellite stuff“
  • “Naturally trendy?“
  • “Cloudy outlook for albedo?“
  • “On a Weakening of the Walker Circulation“
  • “The sky IS falling“
  • “On Mid-latitude Storms“
  • “Uncertainty in polar ozone depletion?“
  • “Tropical tropospheric trends“
  • “Butterflies, tornadoes and climate modelling“
  • “Tropical tropospheric trends again“
  • “Tropical tropospheric trends again (again)“
  • “Ozone holes and cosmic rays“

Climate modelling:

  • “Is Climate Modelling Science?“
  • “Planetary energy imbalance?“
  • “Modeller vs. modeller“
  • “Chaos and Climate“
  • “Greenhouse gases help seasonal predictions“
  • “Polar Amplification“
  • “Climate Feedbacks“
  • “Short and simple arguments for why climate can be predicted“
  • “The Physics of Climate Modelling“
  • “Hansen’s 1988 projections“
  • “Why global climate models do not give a realistic description of the local climate“
  • “Green and Armstrong’s scientific forecast“
  • “Musings about models“
  • “The IPCC model simulation archive“
  • ““Hell train station”“
  • “What the IPCC models really say“
  • “Global Cooling-Wanna Bet?“
  • “The Global Cooling Bet – Part 2“
  • “Hypothesis testing and long range memory“
  • “FAQ on climate models“

Climate sensitivity:

  • “11ºC warming, climate crisis in 10 years?“
  • “Climate sensitivity and aerosol forcings“
  • “Natural Variability and Climate Sensitivity“
  • “Richard Lindzen’s HoL testimony“
  • “Climate sensitivity: Plus ça change…“
  • “Runaway tipping points of no return“
  • “Climate Feedbacks“
  • “The CO2 problem in 6 easy steps“
  • “Climate Insensitivity“
  • “The certainty of uncertainty“
  • “Target CO2“
  • “Simple Question, Simple Answer… Not“

Extreme events:

  • “Storms and Climate Change“
  • “Storms & Global Warming II“
  • “Hurricanes and Global Warming – Is There a Connection?“
  • “On record-breaking events“
  • “Reactions to tighter hurricane intensity/SST link“
  • “Tropical Cyclones workshop“
  • “Gray and Muddy Thinking about Global Warming“
  • “NOAA: Hurricane forecasts“
  • “Amazonian drought“
  • “Fact, Fiction, and Friction in the Hurricane Debate“
  • “Tropical SSTs: Natural variations or Global warming?“
  • “On Mid-latitude Storms“
  • “El Nino, Global Warming, and Anomalous U.S. Winter Warmth“
  • “Hurricane Spin“
  • “Storm World: A Review“
  • “Tropical cyclone history – part I: How reliable are past hurricane records?“
  • “Tropical cyclone history – part II: Paleotempestology still in its infancy“
  • “Climate Change and Tropical Cyclones (Yet Again)“

Global warming:

  • “Imprecision of the Phrase “Global Warming”“
  • “Anomalous Recent Warmth in Europe“
  • “Global temperatures continue to rise“
  • “Update on 2005 temperatures“
  • “2005 temperatures“
  • “Global warming on Mars?“
  • “Ozone depletion and global warming“
  • “How long will global warming last?“
  • “Betting on climate change“
  • “Worldwide glacier retreat“
  • “Why looking for global warming in the oceans is a good idea“
  • “Planetary energy imbalance?“
  • “Tropical Glacier Retreat“
  • “Global warming on Earth“
  • “Q & A: Global Warming“
  • “Methane hydrates and global warming“
  • “Can 2°C warming be avoided?“
  • “Gray and Muddy Thinking about Global Warming“
  • “El Niño and Global Warming“
  • “Geo-engineering in vogue…“
  • “‘The Discovery of Global Warming’ update“
  • “Attribution of 20th Century climate change to CO2“
  • “How much CO2 emission is too much?“
  • “No man is an (Urban Heat) Island“
  • “1934 and all that“
  • “Friday roundup“
  • “Six Degrees“

Greenhouse gases:

  • “What does the lag of CO2 behind temperature in ice cores tell us about global warming?“
  • “How do we know that recent CO2 increases are due to human activities?“
  • “CO2 Fertilization“
  • “Water vapour: feedback or forcing?“
  • “The Acid Ocean – the Other Problem with CO2 Emission“
  • “Busy Week for Water Vapor“
  • “650,000 years of greenhouse gas concentrations“
  • “Methane hydrates and global warming“
  • “Calculating the greenhouse effect“
  • “Methane hydrates and global warming“
  • “Scientists baffled!“
  • “Kristof on the Apocalypse“
  • “Positive feedbacks from the carbon cycle“
  • “Buying a stairway to heaven?“
  • “Rasslin’ swamp gas“
  • “How much CO2 emission is too much?“
  • “The sky IS falling“
  • “Learning from a simple model“
  • “The lag between temperature and CO2. (Gore’s got it right.)“
  • “Beck to the future“
  • “Thin Soup and a Thin Story“
  • “Part II: What Ångström didn’t know“
  • “A Saturated Gassy Argument“
  • “The CO2 problem in 6 easy steps“
  • “My model, used for deception“
  • “CO2 equivalents“
  • “Is the ocean carbon sink sinking?“
  • “Hot off the projector #3: Atmospheric CO2 to 800 kyr ago“
  • “Venus Unveiled“
  • “CO2 is not the only greenhouse gas, and greenhouse effects are not the only CO2 problem“

Mitigation of Climate Change:

  • “Geo-engineering in vogue…“
  • “Air Capture“
  • “Climate change methadone?“
  • “The mpg confusion“
  • “Tropical tropospheric trends again (again)“

Oceans:

  • “Gulf Stream slowdown?“
  • “Saltier or not?“
  • “Decrease in Atlantic circulation?“
  • “The Acid Ocean – the Other Problem with CO2 Emission“
  • “Atlantic circulation change summary“
  • “El Niño and Global Warming“
  • “Ocean heat content: latest numbers“
  • “Why greenhouse gases heat the ocean“
  • “Tropical SSTs: Natural variations or Global warming?“
  • “Carl Wunsch, The Economist and the Gulf Stream“
  • “Ocean Circulation: New evidence (Yes), slowdown (No)“
  • “Revealed: Secrets of Abrupt Climate Shifts“
  • “A Linkage Between the LIA and Gulf Stream?“
  • “The IPCC sea level numbers“
  • “Ocean Cooling. Not.“
  • “Thin Soup and a Thin Story“
  • “Who ya gonna call?“
  • “Of buckets and blogs“
  • “Ocean heat content revisions“

Paleo-climate:

  • “Temperature Variations in Past Centuries and the so-called "Hockey Stick"“
  • “False Claims by McIntyre and McKitrick regarding the Mann et al. (1998) reconstruction“
  • “Myth vs. Fact Regarding the "Hockey Stick"“
  • “Weren’t temperatures warmer than today during the “Medieval Warm Period”?“
  • “OK, But we do know it was warmer than present 6000 years ago, don’t we?“
  • “On Yet Another False Claim by McIntyre and McKitrick“
  • “What If … the “Hockey Stick” Were Wrong?“
  • “Dummies guide to the latest “Hockey Stick” controversy“
  • “Moberg et al: Highly variable Northern Hemisphere temperatures?“
  • ““New Analysis Reproduces Graph of Late 20th Century Temperature Rise”“
  • “Hockey sticks: Round 27“
  • “Debate over the Early Anthropogenic Hypothesis“
  • “A New Take on an Old Millennium“
  • “Sir Nicholas Shackleton“
  • “A Mistake with Repercussions“
  • “Art and climate“
  • “Addendum to “A Mistake with Repercussions”“
  • “How Red are my Proxies?“
  • “National Academies Synthesis Report“
  • “Medieval warmth and English wine“
  • “The missing piece at the Wegman hearing“
  • “Followup to the ‘Hockeystick’ Hearings“
  • “Revealed: Secrets of Abrupt Climate Shifts“
  • “Broadly Misleading“
  • “A Linkage Between the LIA and Gulf Stream?“
  • “When the mites go up…“
  • “What triggers ice ages?“
  • “Cold Case vs. CSI“
  • “The lag between temperature and CO2. (Gore’s got it right.)“
  • “The weirdest millennium“
  • “Curve manipulation: lesson 2“
  • “Younger Dry-as dust?“
  • “Past reconstructions: problems, pitfalls and progress“
  • “The debate is just beginning — on the Cretaceous!“
  • “Tropical cyclone history – part I: How reliable are past hurricane records?“
  • “Tropical cyclone history – part II: Paleotempestology still in its infancy“
  • “536 AD and all that“
  • “Progress in reconstructing climate in recent millennia“

Present-day observations:

  • “Et Tu LT?“
  • “The tropical lapse rate quandary“
  • “Gulf Stream slowdown?“
  • “What is a first-order climate forcing?“
  • “The Surface Temperature Record and the Urban Heat Island“
  • “Groundhog Day“
  • “Cloudy outlook for albedo?“
  • “More on the Arctic“
  • “Historical climatology in Greenland“
  • “Has Pacific Northwest snowpack declined? Yes.“
  • “Glacier Mass Balance: equilibrium or disequilibrium response?“
  • “No man is an (Urban Heat) Island“
  • “1934 and all that“
  • “Sweatin’ the Mediterranean Heat“
  • “Are Temperature Trends affected by Economic Activity (II)?“
  • “A barrier to understanding?“
  • “Uncertainty, noise and the art of model-data comparison“
  • “Model-data-comparison, Lesson 2“
  • “Global trends and ENSO“
  • “Mind the Gap!“
  • “Mountains and molehills“
  • “2008 temperature summaries and spin“

Projections of future climate:

  • “Climate model scenarios“
  • “Make your own forecasts of future energy, carbon emissions, and climate“
  • “Lawson vs. the IPCC“
  • “Can 2°C warming be avoided?“
  • “James Lovelock’s Gloomy Vision“
  • “Kristof on the Apocalypse“
  • “Stern Science“
  • “Hansen’s 1988 projections“
  • “Green and Armstrong’s scientific forecast“
  • “Regional Climate Projections“
  • “The Forecast in the Streets“
  • ““Hell train station”“

Responses to common contrarian arguments:

  • “Michaels misquotes Hansen“
  • “Antarctic cooling, global warming?“
  • “What does the lag of CO2 behind temperature in ice cores tell us about global warming?“
  • “Are Temperature Trends affected by Economic Activity?“
  • “Fox News gets it wrong“
  • “Michael Crichton’s State of Confusion“
  • “Michael Crichton’s State of Confusion II: Return of the Science“
  • “Climate Change Disinformation“
  • “Will-full ignorance“
  • “George Will-misled and misleading“
  • “The global cooling myth“
  • “Strange Bedfellows“
  • “Myth vs. Fact Regarding the "Hockey Stick"“
  • “What If … the “Hockey Stick” Were Wrong?“
  • “Water vapour: feedback or forcing?“
  • “How much of the recent CO2 increase is due to human activities?“
  • “Inhofe and Crichton: Together at Last!“
  • “How to be a real sceptic“
  • “The Wall Street Journal vs. The Scientific Consensus“
  • “Senator Inhofe on Climate Change“
  • “CO2 Fertilization“
  • “Calculating the greenhouse effect“
  • “Good climate debate FAQ“
  • “Bush on “The Fundamental Debate”“
  • “Incurious George“
  • “Heat Rising at the Washington Post“
  • “Open Thread on Lindzen Op-Ed in WSJ“
  • “Lindzen: point by point“
  • “Thank you for emitting“
  • “Global cooling, again“
  • “Cuckoo Science“
  • “English vineyards again….“
  • “Avery and Singer: Unstoppable hot air“
  • “Inhofe’s last stand“
  • “Swindled!“
  • “Swindled: Carl Wunsch responds“
  • “Does a Global Temperature Exist?“
  • “Lindzen in Newsweek“
  • “The lag between temperature and CO2. (Gore’s got it right.)“
  • “Beck to the future“
  • “The weirdest millennium“
  • “Curve manipulation: lesson 2“
  • “Oregon Institute of Science and Malarkey“
  • “BBC contrarian top 10“
  • “Les Chevaliers de l’Ordre de la Terre Plate, Part I: Allègre and Courtillot“
  • “Les Chevaliers de l’Ordre de la Terre Plate, Part II: Courtillot’s Geomagnetic Excursion“
  • “The global cooling mole“
  • “Impressions from the European Geophysical Union conference 2008“
  • “Freeman Dyson’s selective vision“
  • “Once more unto the bray“
  • “Not the IPCC (“NIPCC”) Report“

Scientific Practice:

  • “Statistical analysis of consensus“
  • “Just what is this Consensus anyway?“
  • “Exeter conference: Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change“
  • “Is Climate Modelling Science?“
  • “IPCC in action: Part I“
  • “IPCC in action: Part II“
  • “Peer Review: A Necessary But Not Sufficient Condition“
  • “Peer Review: A Necessary But Not Sufficient Condition II“
  • “Lawson vs. the IPCC“
  • “How to be a real sceptic“
  • “Hansen in the New York Times“
  • “Happy Birthday, Charles Darwin!“
  • “A Mistake with Repercussions“
  • “How not to write a press release“
  • “Communicating Science & Technology“
  • “The Copenhagen Consensus“
  • “Nature’s press advisories“
  • “Chinese whispers in Australia“
  • “AGU, AAPG and AMQUA“
  • “Supreme Court Amicus Curiae from scientists“
  • “Further comment on the Supreme Court briefs“
  • “Fall AGU“
  • “AGU Hangover“
  • “The IPCC Fourth Assessment SPM“
  • “Fraser Institute fires off a damp squib“
  • “Ozone Hole Leaks and Other Tales“
  • “Full IPCC AR4 report now available“
  • “Transparency of the IPCC process“
  • “Perspectives from China“
  • “Spanish perspectives“
  • “What if you held a conference, and no (real) scientists came?“
  • “Blogs and peer-review“
  • “Bridging the divides“
  • “Are geologists different?“
  • “A new survey of scientists“
  • “Greenspan, Einstein and Reich“
  • “Contrarians and consensus: The case of the midwife toad“

Solar forcing:

  • “Recent Warming But No Trend in Galactic Cosmic Rays“
  • “A critique on Veizer’s Celestial Climate Driver“
  • “The lure of solar forcing“
  • “Did the Sun hit record highs over the last few decades?“
  • “Another study on solar influence“
  • “The trouble with sunspots“
  • “How not to attribute climate change“
  • “Taking Cosmic Rays for a spin“
  • “Nigel Calder in the Times“
  • “‘Cosmoclimatology’ – tired old arguments in new clothes“
  • “Cosmic rays don’t die so easily“

Climate in the Media:

  • “The False Objectivity of “Balance”“
  • “Getting the balance right…“
  • “Al Gore’s movie“
  • “Disinformation? You want it, IREA’s got it“
  • “Peter Doran and how misleading talking points propagate“
  • “The missing repertoire“
  • “Sachs’ WSJ Challenge“
  • “Consensus as the New Heresy“
  • “The Human Hand in Climate Change“
  • “WSJ Editorial Board: Head Still Buried in the Sand“
  • “Climate Reporting in Physics World“
  • “Broad Irony“
  • “A Tale of Three Interviews“
  • “Cockburn’s form“
  • “Global Warming Delusions at the Wall Street Journal“
  • “A phenomenological sequel“
  • “Find the error“
  • “A day when Hell was frozen“
  • “Wired Magazine’s Incoherent Truths“
  • “More PR related confusion“
  • “Journalistic whiplash“
  • “Palin on Global Warming“
  • “Why don’t op-eds get fact checked?“

Meeting Reports:

  • “Live (almost) from AGU–Dispatch #1“
  • “Live (almost) from AGU–Dispatch #2“
  • “Hot off the projector #3: Atmospheric CO2 to 800 kyr ago“
  • “Live (almost) from AGU–Dispatch #4“
  • “Notes from The Gathering #5: Arctic sea ice: is it tipped yet?“
  • “Live (almost) from AGU–Dispatch #6“
  • “Rolling up the circus tent: Dispatch #7“
  • “Impressions from the European Geophysical Union conference 2008“
  • “Field notes from a Nature Conservancy meeting“

Miscellaneous:

  • “Welcome to RealClimate“
  • “A disclaimer“
  • “RealClimate In the News“
  • “Doubts about the Advent of Spring“
  • “Scientists respond to Barton“
  • “Framing of climate science“
  • “Books books books“
  • “One year on…“
  • “Hansen in the New York Times“
  • “Those pesky scientific facts…“
  • “Meteors, Nuclear Tests and Global Warming“
  • “Pielke père et fils in Nature“
  • “Washington Post Cartoon“
  • “IPCC draft: No comment.“
  • “MY Review of Books“
  • “Introducing RC forum“
  • “It’s different in Europe“
  • “The Copenhagen Consensus“
  • “New public opinion poll on global warming“
  • “New Google search function“
  • “2006 Year in review“
  • “Calling All Science Teachers“
  • “Save the World! Earn $25 million!“
  • “Global Warming debate“
  • “Adventures on the East Side“
  • “The Sheep Albedo Feedback“
  • “Fun with correlations!“
  • “A bit of philosophy“
  • “G8 summit declaration“
  • “Convenient Untruths“
  • “The “Have you stopped beating your wife yet (yes/no)” questionnaire“
  • “Sustainability: A Nobel Cause“
  • “Did we call it or what“
  • “Books ’07“
  • “Our Books“
  • “Comprehensive climate glossary“
  • “Books ’08“
  • “2008 Year in review“

Filed Under: Extras

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 49
  • Page 50
  • Page 51
  • Page 52
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Raising Climate Literacy
  • Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Time and Tide Gauges wait for no Voortman

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Tomáš Kalisz on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Robert Cutler on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Susan Anderson on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Susan Anderson on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Susan Anderson on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Ken Towe on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Ken Towe on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Oct 2025
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Ray Ladbury on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Eric Guilyardi on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Yebo Kando on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • JB on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Rory Allen on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Barry E Finch on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Radge Havers on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Mark Serreze on Raising Climate Literacy
  • zebra on “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 years!”
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Nov 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,386 posts

11 pages

248,040 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.