• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / Unforced Variations: Aug 2021

Unforced Variations: Aug 2021

2 Aug 2021 by group

This month is IPCC month – the Sixth Assessment Report from Working Group 1 is out on Monday August 9. We’ll have some detailed comments once it’s out, but in the meantime, feel free to speculate widely (always considering that IPCC is restricted to assessing existing literature…).

Open thread – please stick to climate science topics.

Filed Under: Climate Science, IPCC, Open thread

Reader Interactions

371 Responses to "Unforced Variations: Aug 2021"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 2 3
  1. Alastair McDonald says

    1 Sep 2021 at 2:13 PM

    There was a paper published recently saying something like we should not be modelling CO2 but rather we should look at radiation balance. Because I don’t know what it really said I can’t Google for it. Does anyone known the paper I am talking about?
    TIA, Alastair.

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’
  • Unforced Variations: Aug 2025

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • David on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Kevin McKinney on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • David on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Russell Seitz on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Russell Seitz on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • David on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Ray Ladbury on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Susan Anderson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • b fagan on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • nigelj on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Mal Adapted on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • MA Rodger on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • b fagan on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Mal Adapted on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • zebra on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Barton Paul Levenson on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,379 posts

11 pages

246,750 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.