• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / Climate Science / Unforced variations: Dec 2020

Unforced variations: Dec 2020

1 Dec 2020 by group

This month’s open thread. Topics might include the record breaking hurricane season, odds for the warmest year horse race (and it’s relevance or not), or indeed anything climate science related.

Filed Under: Climate Science, Open thread

Reader Interactions

304 Responses to "Unforced variations: Dec 2020"

Comments pagination

« Previous 1 … 5 6 7
  1. nigelj says

    31 Dec 2020 at 5:28 PM

    Killian @290, it’s really obvious something suspicious could be going on with the the last two years sea ice and warming trends, like some sort of systems change or acceleration. I’ve thought it myself for some time now. Hansen wrote a study on it so he clearly thought things might be changing or accelerating, and he clearly saw a suspicious pattern. Why do I need to listen intently to someone who states the obvious?

  2. Al Bundy says

    31 Dec 2020 at 6:58 PM

    mrkia: I did not make it up…may be ushering in a new ice age in the northern latitudes…Evidence in 2020 that this ice age has already started includes:…southern TEXAS, may receive up to 18 inches of snow!!!

    AB: Please explain how the slowing of the export of heat from the Caribbean by the AMOC/Gulf Stream system would cause the heating of the Caribbean, o so stable genus…

  3. Al Bundy says

    31 Dec 2020 at 7:05 PM

    Well, this genus isn’t so stable. I meant that cool Texas temps isn’t evidence of a reduction of heat transport from the Caribbean. Oops!

    In fact, a warmer Caribbean could loft enough water vapor that a storm could mix in with colder air, causing mega-snow!

    Hmm, mebbe mrkia backed into a logical argument?

  4. John Pollack says

    31 Dec 2020 at 10:47 PM

    Mr. Know It All @288 If we’re really headed into a new ice age, it ought to be easy for you to find someplace that had a minimum 54F below normal, or was 17F colder than their previous record minimum for an entire 10-day window – just the opposite of what Norman Wells NWT achieved for a maximum temperature on Dec. 3. I’m still waiting….

    And speaking of snow in south Texas, has there been any measurable snow observed in Brownsville since the 1800s: 1852, 1866, or 1880? Then, there was Feb. 15 1895, when Brownsville got 6″ and Houston 20″. Think those amounts will be exceeded this winter?

  5. Barton Paul Levenson says

    1 Jan 2021 at 6:54 AM

    “Never trust a quote you read on the internet.”
    –Abraham Lincoln

« Older Comments

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Lil’ NAS Express
  • DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Critique of Chapter 6 “Extreme Weather” in the DOE review
  • Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Critiques of the ‘Critical Review’

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Ted Moffett on Lil’ NAS Express
  • Mo Yunus on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Russell Seitz on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Mal Adapted on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Steven Emmerson on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Steven Emmerson on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Mal Adapted on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • b fagan on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Barton Paul Levenson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • David on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Kevin McKinney on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • David on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Russell Seitz on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Mo Yunus on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Russell Seitz on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • David on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • Ray Ladbury on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Susan Anderson on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • b fagan on Climate Scientists response to DOE report
  • patrick o twentyseven on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • nigelj on DOE CWG Report “Moot”?
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced Variations: Sep 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,380 posts

11 pages

246,759 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.