• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / 2005 / Archives for April 2005

Archives for April 2005

Pollution-Climate Connections Liens entre Pollution et Climat

26 Apr 2005 by group

Guest commentary by Loretta Mickley, Harvard University

Every summer over much of the United States, we brace ourselves for heat waves. During these periods, the air turns muggy and usually smoggy. After a few days, a cold front moves in, sweeping away the pollution and ending the heat. Given that we are on a path towards global warming, atmospheric chemists are asking how climate change could affect air quality. Will warmer temperatures mean more pollution during these episodes? Will episodes last longer? Most importantly, what effect will changes in air quality have on human health?
Article invité par Loretta Mickley, Harvard University (Traduit par Pierre Allemand)

Tous les étés, dans la plupart des régions des USA, nous nous préparons aux vagues de chaleur. Pendant ces périodes, l’air devient très humide et généralement brumeux. Après quelques jours, un front froid survient, balayant la pollution et mettant fin à la chaleur. Etant donné que nous nous acheminons vers un réchauffement global, les spécialistes de la chimie de l’atmosphère se demandent de quelle façon le changement climatique pourrait affecter la qualité de l’air. Des températures plus élevées signifieront-elles plus de pollution durant ces épisodes ? Ces épisodes dureront-ils plus longtemps ? Plus important : quels sont les effets des changements dans la qualité de l’air sur la santé humaine ?
(suite…)

[Read more…] about Pollution-Climate Connections Liens entre Pollution et Climat

Filed Under: Aerosols, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Greenhouse gases

Retreating Glacier Fronts on the Antarctic Peninsula over the Past Half-Century Recul du Front des Glaciers de la Péninsule Antarctique au cours des 50 dernières années

22 Apr 2005 by group

Guest commentary by David Vaughan

The recent retreat of ice shelves on the Antarctic Peninsula has been widely attributed to warming atmospheric temperatures. There is, however, little published work describing the response of glacier margin positions to this regional climate change. In the paper Retreating Glacier Fronts on the Antarctic Peninsula over the Past Half-Century published this week in Science, we presented new data describing trends in 244 marine glacier fronts on the Antarctic Peninsula over the last 50 years. The data come from matching archives of over 2000 aerial photographs of the Antarctic Peninsula to satellite images, and represent about three years of work by Alison Cook. The work was carried out at British Antarctic Survey, but was funded by the US Geological Survey, as part of a larger programme to map change in the coastline of all Antarctica.

[Read more…] about Retreating Glacier Fronts on the Antarctic Peninsula over the Past Half-Century Recul du Front des Glaciers de la Péninsule Antarctique au cours des 50 dernières années

Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Climate Science

Ozone depletion and global warming Perte d’ozone et réchauffement climatique Ozon Azalması ve Küresel Isınma

14 Apr 2005 by Gavin

One of the most common mistakes that we have observed in discussions of climate and atmospheric change is confusion between the rather separate concepts of ozone depletion and global warming. This isn’t necessarily surprising given the scant information that most people pick up from the media. However, for many years meteorologists have been fighting a rearguard action to persuade people that the globe isn’t warming because there is more sun coming through the ozone hole. There are however important connections between the two issues that complicate potential actions that we might take to alleviate the different problems. This week, for instance, a new IPCC report was released that looked at the greenhouse warming potential of many of the replacement chemicals (HFCs and HCFCs) that were used to replace CFCs in aerosol cans and refrigeration units under the Montreal Protocol (and subsequent amendments).
par Gavin Schmidt, traduit par Vincent Noel

Dans le débat sur le changement climatique, l’une des erreurs les plus courantes est la confusion entre la diminution de l’ozone et le réchauffement planétaire. Ceci n’est pas vraiment surprenant, compte tenu de la qualité discutable des informations propagées par les medias.

Depuis plusieurs années maintenant, les climatologues et météorologues tentent d’expliquer au public que si la planète se rechauffe, ce n’est pas parce qu’il y a davantage de rayonnement solaire qui passe par le trou dans la couche d’ozone. Les deux phénomenes sont cependant étroitement liés, ce qui complique l’adoption d’une stratégie pour s’attaquer à l’un ou l’autre de ces problèmes. Cette semaine, par exemple, un nouveau rapport de l’IPCC s’est interessé au possible effet de serre des produits chimiques (HCF et HCFC) utilisés pour remplacer les CFC dans les bombes aérosols et les systèmes de refroidissement dans le cadre du protocole de Montréal (et de ses amendements).

(suite…)

[Read more…] about Ozone depletion and global warming Perte d’ozone et réchauffement climatique Ozon Azalması ve Küresel Isınma

Filed Under: Climate Science, Greenhouse gases

Water vapour: feedback or forcing?

6 Apr 2005 by Gavin

Whenever three or more contrarians are gathered together, one will inevitably claim that water vapour is being unjustly neglected by ‘IPCC’ scientists. “Why isn’t water vapour acknowledged as a greenhouse gas?”, “Why does anyone even care about the other greenhouse gases since water vapour is 98% of the effect?”, “Why isn’t water vapour included in climate models?”, “Why isn’t included on the forcings bar charts?” etc. Any mainstream scientist present will trot out the standard response that water vapour is indeed an important greenhouse gas, it is included in all climate models, but it is a feedback and not a forcing. From personal experience, I am aware that these distinctions are not clear to many, and so here is a more in-depth response (see also this other attempt).

Eine Übersetzung in deutsch finden Sie hier.
[Read more…] about Water vapour: feedback or forcing?

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, FAQ, Greenhouse gases

Doubts about the Advent of Spring

1 Apr 2005 by Stefan

A “consensus view” amongst climate scientists holds that the Northern Hemisphere will be warming this month, as spring is coming. This is thought to be due to the Earth’s orbit around the sun and the inclination of the Earth’s axis, tilting the Northern Hemisphere progressively towards the sun throughout March and April and increasing the amount of solar radiation received at northern latitudes.

In a new novel, State of Euphoria, bestselling author Michael Crikey uncovers major flaws in this theory and warns against false hopes for the arrival of spring.
[Read more…] about Doubts about the Advent of Spring

Filed Under: Climate modelling, Climate Science, Instrumental Record, Sun-earth connections

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • Who should pay?
  • Site updates etc.
  • Raising Climate Literacy
  • Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • High-resolution ‘fingerprint’ images reveal a weakening Atlantic Ocean circulation (AMOC)
  • Unforced variations: Oct 2025

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Geoff Miell on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Neurodivergent on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Ron R. on Who should pay?
  • MS on Who should pay?
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Nigelj on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • zebra on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Geoff Miell on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Yebo Kando on Raising Climate Literacy
  • John Pollack on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Ron R. on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Nigelj on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Tomáš Kalisz on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Yebo Kando on Raising Climate Literacy
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Nigelj on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Piotr on Unforced variations: Nov 2025
  • Atomsk's Sanakan on Unforced variations: Nov 2025

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,388 posts

15 pages

248,674 comments

Copyright © 2025 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.