• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

RealClimate

Climate science from climate scientists...

  • Start here
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics
  • Surface temperature graphics
You are here: Home / 2005 / Archives for January 2005

Archives for January 2005

Senator Inhofe on Climate Change

10 Jan 2005 by group

by Michael Mann, Stefan Rahmstorf, Gavin Schmidt, Eric Steig, and William Connolley

Senator James Inhofe (R) of Oklahoma recently provided us with an update of his views on the issue of climate change in a speech given on the opening senate session, January 4, 2005. His speech opened with the statement:

As I said on the Senate floor on July 28, 2003, “much of the debate over global warming is predicated on fear, rather than science.” I called the threat of catastrophic global warming the “greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people,” a statement that, to put it mildly, was not viewed kindly by environmental extremists and their elitist organizations.

Cutting through much of his polemic, Inhofe’s speech contains three lines of scientific argument which, according to him, provide “compelling new scientific evidence” that anthropogenic global warming is not threatening. We here submit his statements to scrutiny.
[Read more…] about Senator Inhofe on Climate Change

Filed Under: Arctic and Antarctic, Climate modelling, Climate Science, Greenhouse gases, Paleoclimate

On Yet Another False Claim by McIntyre and McKitrick

6 Jan 2005 by mike

McIntyre and McKitrick (MM), in one of their many false claims regarding the Mann et al (MBH98) temperature reconstruction, assert that the “Hockey Stick” shape of the reconstruction is an artifact of the “non-centered” Principal Components Analysis (PCA) convention used by MBH98 in representing the North American International Tree Ring Data Bank (ITRDB) data series. We already demonstrated the falsehood of this assertion here by showing (a) that the hockey stick pattern emerges using either the MM (centered) or MBH98 (non-centered) PCA conventions, but was censored by MM through an inappropriate application of selection rules for determining the number of Principal Component (PC) to retain, (b) that use of the correct number of PC series (5) to be kept with the MM (centered) convention retains the characteristic “Hockey Stick” pattern as an important predictor, and yields essentially the same temperature reconstruction as MBH98, and finally [Read more…] about On Yet Another False Claim by McIntyre and McKitrick

Filed Under: Paleoclimate, Supplemental data

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2

Primary Sidebar

Search

Search for:

Email Notification

get new posts sent to you automatically (free)
Loading

Recent Posts

  • How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • The Climate Science reference they don’t want Judges to read
  • Koonin’s Continuing Calumnies
  • Unforced variations: Feb 2026

Our Books

Book covers
This list of books since 2005 (in reverse chronological order) that we have been involved in, accompanied by the publisher’s official description, and some comments of independent reviewers of the work.
All Books >>

Recent Comments

  • Pete Best on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Wolfgang on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Martin Smith on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Martin Smith on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Atomsk’s Sanakan on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Dominik Lenné on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • zebra on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Ken Towe on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • JCM on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Barton Paul Levenson on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Paul Pukite (@whut) on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Pete Best on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Ron R. on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Keith Woollard on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • John Pollack on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Ray Ladbury on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Secular Animist on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Ray Ladbury on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Ray Ladbury on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Ray Ladbury on How robust is our accelerometer?
  • Radge Havers on EPA’s final* ruling on CO2
  • Kevin McKinney on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026
  • Susan Anderson on Unforced Variations: Mar 2026

Footer

ABOUT

  • About
  • Translations
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Page
  • Login

DATA AND GRAPHICS

  • Data Sources
  • Model-Observation Comparisons
  • Surface temperature graphics
  • Miscellaneous Climate Graphics

INDEX

  • Acronym index
  • Index
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Realclimate Stats

1,400 posts

15 pages

250,701 comments

Copyright © 2026 · RealClimate is a commentary site on climate science by working climate scientists for the interested public and journalists.